Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Nassau County and Parking Violation Agency et al v. Whyte
as 2:2018cv05319
Plaintiff:
Nassau County and Parking Violation Agency, Nassau NY Photo Enforcment Division and The State of New York
Defendant:
Jovanni Giuseppe Whyte
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Suffolk County Traffic and Parking Violation Agency v. Whyte
as 2:2018cv04626
Plaintiff:
Suffolk County Traffic and Parking Violation Agency
Defendant:
Jovanni Guiseppe Whyte
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Ewan et al v. National Grid USA Service Company, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv07472
Plaintiff:
Danai Ewan and Charmaine Whyte
Defendant:
National Grid USA Service Company, Inc. and The Brooklyn Union Gas Company
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605 Unauthorized publication or use of communications
Ewan et al v. National Grid USA Service Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv07472
Plaintiff:
Danai Ewan and Charmaine Whyte
Defendant:
National Grid USA Service Company, Inc. and The Brooklyn Union Gas Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
Citizens Against Casino Gambli v. Hogen
as 13-2777
Plaintiff - Appellant-Cross-Appellee:
Citizens Against Casino Gambling in Erie County, Joel Rose and Robert Heffern, as Co-Chairpersons, D. Min. G. Stanford Bratton, Reverand, Executive Director of the Network of Religious Communities, Network of Religious Communities and others
Defendant - Appellee-Cross-Appellant:
Philip N. Hogen, in his official capacity as Chairman of the National Indian Gaming Commission, National Indian Gaming Commission and United States Department of the Interior
Citizens Against Casino Gambli v. Hogen
as 13-2339
Plaintiff:
Assemblyman Sam Hoyt
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Citizens Against Casino Gambling in Erie County, Joel Rose and Robert Heffern, as Co-Chairpersons, Rev.D.Min.G. Stanford Bratton, Network of Religious Communities and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Philip N. Hogen, In his Official Capacity as Chairman of the National Indian Gaming Commission, The National Indian Gaming Commission, United States Department of the Interior and others
Citizens Against Casino Gambli v. Norton
as 11-5466
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Citizens Against Casino Gambling in Erie County, Joel Rose and Mary Bartley, as Co-Chairpersons, Coalition Against Casino Gambling in New York-Action, Incorporated, National Coalition Against Gambling Expansion and others
Defendant - Appellee:
James Cason, in his official capacity as the Acting Assistant Secretary of the Interior for Indian Affairs, United States Department of the Interior, Philip N. Hogen, in his capacityas Chairman of the National Indian Gaming Commission and others
Intervenor - Appellant:
County of Erie New York and Joel A. Giambra
Amicus Curiae:
Seneca Nation of Indians
Citizens Against Casino Gambli v. Hogen
as 11-5171
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Citizens Against Casino Gambling in Erie County, Joel Rose and Robert Heffern, as Co-Chairpersons, D. Min. G. Stanford Bratton, Reverand, Executive Director of the Network of Religious Communities, Network of Religious Communities and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Philip N. Hogen, in his official capacity as Chairman of the National Indian Gaming Commission, National Indian Gaming Commission and United States Department of the Interior
Betters Homes Depot Inc. v. Whyte et al
as 1:2010cv03246
Plaintiff:
Betters Homes Depot Inc.
Defendant:
Elma Gibbs, Everette Weaver and Coleen Whyte
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Citizens Against Casino v. Hogen
as 10-2132
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Citizens Against Casino Gambling in Erie County, Joel Rose and Robert Heffern, as Co-Chairpersons, Rev.D.Min.G. Stanford Bratton, Network of Religious Communities and others
Defendant:
Philip N. Hogen, In his Official Capacity as Chairman of the National Indian Gaming Commission, The National Indian Gaming Commission, the United States Department of the Interior and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Seneca Nation of Indians
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
