Other Statutes Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 101 - 110 of 288
Komatsu v. The City of New York
as 21-73
Defendant / Appellee: Christopher Fowler, NYPD Officer (badge #: 3185), sued in individual and official capacities, Keith Dietrich, NYPD Officer (shield #5779), John Doe, NYPD Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Towaki Komatsu
Defendant: John Doe, 1,
Barnes v. The City of New York We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-33
Defendant / Appellee: Officer Michael Manetta, Shield No. 241, Officer Nicholas Mauceli, Shield No. 9894, City of New York and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Tommy Barnes
Biton v. City of New York
as 21-23
Defendant / Appellee: Sergeant Ian Nadel, 66th Precinct, in his individual and official capacities, Latisha Wright, 66th Precinct, in her individual and official capacities and City of New York
Defendant: Police Officers John/Jane Does 1-10, Avaril, 66th Precinct, in his/her individual and official capacities and Lieutenant Simms, 66th Precinct, in his/her individual and official capacities
Plaintiff / Appellant: Iris Biton
Komatsu v. The City of New York
as 20-4103
Defendant / Appellee: Christopher Fowler, NYPD Officer (badge #: 3185), sued in individual and official capacities, Keith Dietrich, NYPD Officer (shield #5779), John Doe, NYPD Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Towaki Komatsu
Defendant: John Doe, 1,
Sce v. City of New York
as 20-3954
Defendant / Appellee: Deputy Inspector Sylvestor Ge, in their official capacity as employees of the New York City Police Department, Steven D'Ulisse, in their official capacity as employees of the New York City Police Department, Timothy Morgan, in their official capacity as employees of the New York City Police Department and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Sergeant of Police Andre Sce
Robinson v. US Dept. Justice US DEA
as 20-3956
Defendant: John Doe 1-10, Police Officers/State Troopers sued in ficticious capacities and names as their identities are unkown and as Police Officers/State Troopers and individually, Saratoga County Sheriff Michael Zurlo, Saratoga County Sheriff's Office and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Keisha Robinson, on behalf of K.F., a minor and Keisha Robinson, for herself
Defendant / Appellee: Office of the United States Attorney, United States Department of Justice, Drug Enforcement Agency and New York State Police
Nuzzo v. Devine
as 20-3911
Plaintiff / Appellant: Jeffrey Nuzzo
Defendant / Appellee: Trooper Warren, 649 and Sergeant Devine, 148
Maradiaga v. City of New York
as 20-3747
Plaintiff / Appellant: Cosme Del Rosario-Bell, Jeronimo Maradiaga, Randolph Carr and others
Defendant / Appellee: P.O. Jennifer Gomez, In their individual capacity, P.O. Jack Deng, (Shield No. 8379), in their individual capacity, John Does, New York City Police Department Police Officers (P.O.), 13, (the names John Doe being fictitious, as the true names and shield numbers are not presently known), in their individual capacities and others
Thorpe v. Duve
as 20-3679
Defendant / Appellee: Amanda Nissen, Former St. Lawrence County Assistant Chief D.A., Robert Wescott, Detective/Sergeant, David Layng, Detective and others
Defendant: City of Ogdensburg and County of St. Lawrence
Plaintiff / Appellant: Michael Durand and Michael Thorpe
Vasquez v. The County of Rockland
as 20-3684
Defendant / Appellee: Correction Officer John Kezek, in his individual and official capacity as a Correction Officer employed by the County of Rockland, Correction Officer Paul Orbacz, in his individual and official capacity as a Correction Officer employed by the County of Rockland, Sergeant Karl Mueller, in his individual and official capacity as a Correction Officer employed by the County of Rockland and others
Defendant: Correction Officers John Does, 1-3, in their individual and official capacities as Correction Officers
Plaintiff / Appellant: Kim Vasquez

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?