Cases 11 - 20 of 1,738
Weiss v. Diamondback Energy, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02689
Plaintiff:
Steven Weiss
Defendant:
Diamondback Energy, Inc., Travis D. Stice, Vincent K. Brooks and others
Murphy v. Onondaga County
as 24-900
Plaintiff:
KEVIN MURPHY
Defendant:
ONONDAGA COUNTY, ONONDAGA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, CARL HUMMEL, all individually and in their capacities as employees of Onondaga County and the Onondaga County Sheriff's Department and others
Murphy v. Onondaga County
as 24-904
Plaintiff:
KEVIN MURPHY
Defendant:
ONONDAGA COUNTY, ONONDAGA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, CARL HUMMEL, all individually and in their capacities as employees of Onondaga County and the Onondaga County Sheriff's Department and others
Accardi v. County of Suffolk
as 24-903
Plaintiff:
JAMES K. ACCARDI
Defendant:
COUNTY OF SUFFOLK, SUFFOLK COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, Lieutenant ANDREW MANFREDONIA and others
Gomez v. Cullen
as 24-906
Defendant:
GEORGE ROBINSON, J.B. FOSTER, HSA, K. SORRELL and others
Plaintiff:
JORGE GOMEZ
Tripathy v. Lockwood
as 24-837
Plaintiff:
SANJAY TRIPATHY, -
Defendant:
Captain LOCKWOOD, Reverand HARRIS, SORC R. HOFFMAN, IGRC Chairperson and others
Shomo v. State of New York
as 24-818
Plaintiff:
JOSE SHOMO
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW YORK, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND COMMUNITY SUPERVISION, STEWART ECKERT, Superintendent, individually and in official capacity and others
Weiss v. Kaman Corporation et al
as 3:2024cv00512
Plaintiff:
Steven Weiss
Defendant:
Kaman Corporation, Aisha M. Barry, A. William Higgins and others
Jones v. Kaman Corporation et al
as 3:2024cv00513
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW JONES
Defendant:
Kaman Corporation, Aisha M. Barry, A. WILLIAMS HIGGINS and others
Burrell v. Mason
as 24-737
Plaintiff:
AKO K. BURRELL
Defendant:
BRYAN D. MASON, Sergeant; Clinton Correctional Facility, C.O. GORDON, Clinton Correctional Facility, C.O. DEYO, Clinton Correctional Facility and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
