Cases 11 - 20 of 43
Maradiaga v. Decker
as 21-1184
Respondent:
Alejandro N. Mayorkas, in his official capacity as Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Merrick B. Garland, in his official capacity as Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, Tae Johnson, in his official capacity as Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Director of United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Petitioner:
Javier Castillo Maradiaga
Jimenez v. Decker
as 21-1188
Respondent:
Sheriff Carl E. Dubois, Sheriff, Orange County, Merrick B. Garland, Acting U.S. Attorney General, Thomas Decker, Director, New York Field Office, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Petitioner:
Salomon Aparicio Jimenez
Rodriguez v. Garland
as 21-272
Respondent / Appellee:
Thomas E. Feeley, in his official capacity as Field Office Director, Buffalo Field Office, U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement, Alejandro Mayorkas, in his official capacity as Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Jeffrey Searls, in his official capacity as Acting Assistant Field Office Director and Administrator, Buffalo Federal Detention Facility and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
Nelson Sosa Rodriguez
Gonzalez Evangelista v. Decker
as 21-599
Respondent:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Merrick B. Garland, United States Attorney General, Thomas Decker, Director, New York Field Office of U.S. Immigrations and Customs Enforcement and others
Petitioner:
Juan F. Gonzalez Evangelista
Guodoy Arana v. Decker
as 21-296
Respondent:
Alejandro Mayorkas, in his official capacity as Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Thomas Decker, in his official capacity as Field Office Director, New York City Field Office, U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement, Robert M. Wilkinson, in his official capacity as Acting Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice and others
Petitioner:
Mercedes Guodoy Arana
Hylton v. Decker
as 21-145
Respondent:
Director Thomas Decker, in his official capacity as Field Office Director, New York City Field Office, U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement, Acting Secretary Chad F. Wolf, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Acting Attorney General Monty Wilkinson, in his official capacity as Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice and others
Petitioner:
Gabrae Hylton
Hernandez-Aviles v. Decker
as 20-3995
Petitioner:
Noe Hernandez-Aviles
Respondent:
Attorney General William P. Barr, in his official capacity as Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, Director Thomas Decker, in his official capacity as Field Office Director, New York City Field Office, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Acting Secretary Chad F. Wolf, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Rodriguez v. Decker
as 20-3735
Respondent:
Chad F. Wolf, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Thomas Decker, in his official capacity as Field Office Director, New York City Field Office, U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement and William P. Barr
Petitioner:
Marvin Nolasco Rodriguez
Martinez Roman v. Decker
as 20-3974
Respondent:
Chad F. Wolf, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Thomas Decker, in his official capacity as Field Office Director, New York City Field Office, U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement and William P. Barr, in his official capacity as Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice
Petitioner:
Marco Antonio Martinez Roman
Doe v. Decker
as 20-3449
Respondent:
Chad F. Wolf, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Thomas Decker, in his official capacity as Director of the New York Field Office of U.S. Immigrations & Customs Enforcement and William P. Barr, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States
Petitioner:
John Doe
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
