Cases 21 - 30 of 53
In re: Fannie Mae 2008 Securities Litigation
as 1:2008cv07831
Plaintiff:
Comprehensive Investment Services, Inc., David L. Frankfurt, John A. Genovese and others
Lead Plaintiff:
Boston Retirement Board, Massachusetts Pension Reserves Investment Management Board ("PRIM") and Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System ("TCRS")
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Susan Kraus, Linda P. Schweitzer, Stephen H. Schweitzer and others
Defendant:
Stephen B. Ashley, Banc of America Securities LLC, Robert T Blakely and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Dennis R. Beresford, Deutsche Banc Securities Inc., Louis J. Freeh and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Federal Housing Finance Agency
Petitioner:
International Fund Management S.A., Luxembourg, Richard H. Moore, Martin Mahler and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Smulley v. Mutual of Omaha Bank
as 17-2666
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Dorothy A. Smulley
Defendant - Appellee:
Federal Housing Finance Agency, Federal National Mortgage Association, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Erin Bowen, AKA Erin Kremser, Erin Alicata, an individual residing in Massachusetts, Zeldes, Needle & Cooper, PC, a Connecticut professional corporation and others
In Re: Libor-Based Financial Instruments Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2011md02262
Plaintiff:
303 Proprietary Trading LLC, 303030 Trading LLC, 33-35 Green Pond Road Associates, LLC and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Linda Zacher
Defendant:
All Defendants, BBA Enterprises, Ltd., BBA Libor, Ltd and others
Consolidated Defendant:
RBS Citizens, NA
Interested Party:
ICAP Europe Ltd. and Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP
Petitioner:
Brian McCormick, Vito Spillone and Maxwell Van De Velde
Not Classified By Court:
Tullett Liberty Brokerage Inc., Tullett Prebon Financial Services LLC, Tradition America LLC and others
Receiver:
FDIC, as receiver
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
County of Mendocino, ICAP, City of Houston and others
Respondent:
BBVA Compass Bancshares, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Pennicott v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 1:2016cv03044
Plaintiff:
Marcia P. Pennicott
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. , Seterus, Inc. , Federal National Mortgage Association and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Williams v. American Mortgage Network Incorporated and Federal National Association et al
as 1:2016cv01808
Plaintiff:
Paulette Williams
Defendant:
American Mortgage Network Incorporated and Federal National Association, Federal National Mortgage Association, Unknown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
In Re: Fannie Mae Securities and Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) Litigation
as 1:2009md02013
Defendant:
Federal National Mortgage Association, Stephen B. Ashley, Daniel H. Mudd and others
Plaintiff:
John A. Genovese, Robert M. Rollins, Nicholas Crisafi and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Federal Housing Finance Agency
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv01018
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Federal Housing Finance Agency v. Nomura Holding America, Inc.
as 15-1872
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Federal Housing Finance Agency, as Conservator for the Federal National Mortgage Association and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
Defendant - Appellant:
Nomura Holding America, Inc., Nomura Asset Acceptance Corporation, Nomura Home Equity Loan, Inc. and others
Amicus Curiae:
Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association and The Clearing House, Association LLC
Ashworth et al v. Boggio et al
as 2:2015cv00948
Plaintiff:
Noella Ashworth and Dawn Sears
Defendant:
Judith Boggio, Federal National Mortgage Association, JP Morgan Chase and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Federal National Mortgage Association v. Salov
as 7:2014mc00200
Plaintiff:
Federal National Mortgage Association
Defendant:
Marija Salov
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
