Other Statutes Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Valenzuela Arias v. Decker
as 20-2139
Petitioner: Edson Louis, Santo Valenzuela Arias and Job Velasquez Estrada
Defendant / Appellant: Chad F. Wolf, Acting Secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and Thomas Decker, in his official capacity as Director of the New York Field Office of U.S. Immigrations & Customs Enforcement
Basank v. Decker
as 20-1966
Petitioner: Milton Barbecho, Vasif Basank, "Vincent", Job Velasquez Estrada and others
Respondent: Director Thomas Decker, in his official capacity as Director of the New York Field Office of U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement and Acting Secretary Chad F. Wolf, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Rosemond v. Decker
as 20-1825
Respondent: Director Thomas Decker, in his official capacity as Field Office Director, New York City Field Office, U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement, Attorney General William P. Barr, n his official capacity as Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, Acting Secretary Kevin McAleenan, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Petitioner: Jean Rosemond
Mathurin v. Barr
as 20-1810
Respondent: Chad F. Wolf, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Jeffrey Searls, in his official capacity as Acting Assistant Field Office Director and Administrator, Buffalo Federal Detention Facility, Thomas E. Feeley, in his official capacity as Field Office Director, Buffalo Field Office, U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement and others
Petitioner: Ravely Junior Mathurin
Guerrero v. Decker
as 20-1615
Petitioner: Domingo Guerrero
Respondent: Thomas Decker, in his official capacity as Field Office Director, New York City Field Office, U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement, Chad F. Wolf, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and William P. Barr, in his official capacity as Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice
Cabanillas Lazo v. Decker
as 20-1140
Respondent: Chad F. Wolf, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, William P. Barr, in his official capacity as Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice and Thomas Decker, in his official capacity as Field Office Director, New York City Field Office, U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement
Petitioner: Jim Marco Cabanillas Lazo
Austin Sanctuary Network et al v. United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv01686
Defendant: U.S. Immigration Customs Enforcement, United States Department of the Treasury, Executive Office For Immigration Review and others
Plaintiff: Austin Sanctuary Network, Free Migration Project, Grassroots Leadership and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Medley v. Decker
as 20-631
Defendant / Appellant: Chad F. Wolf, as Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, in his official capacity, Thomas Decker, as Field Office Director, New York City Field Office, U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement, in his official capacity and William P. Barr, as Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, in his official capacity
Plaintiff / Appellee: Leon Leonard Medley
Liranzo de la Cruz v. Decker
as 19-3831
Not Yet Classified: Thomas Decker, in his official capacity as Field Office Director, New York City Field Office, U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement, Kevin K. McAleenan, in her official capacity as Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Alejandro Liranzo de la Cruz and others
Connecticut v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 3:2019cv01597
Defendant: in his official capa Kevin McAleenan, Executive Office for Immigration Review, in his official capa James Mchenry and others
Plaintiff: State of Connecticut
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?