Cases 31 - 40 of 84
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv06373
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
DeLee v. Russo
as 19-3634
Defendant:
Superintendent John Doe, or Jane Doe, Central Office of Class and Movement John Doe, Dept. Supt. of Security, John Doe, John Doe and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Sergeant F. Deleaney, Correctional Officer, Joseph Rogers, Correctional Officer, Gowanda Correctional Facility, Mr. Gates, Correctional Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Maurice L. DeLee
Roache v. McCulloch
as 19-3530
Petitioner / Appellant:
Walter J. Roache
Respondent / Appellee:
Deborah McCulloch
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00391
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
28th Highline Associates, L.L. v. Roache
as 19-740
Not Yet Classified:
28th Highline Associates, L.L.C. and Iain Roache
Deuel et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv12272
Plaintiff:
Tara Haskell, Joseph P. Deuel, Gideon Huttler and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333
Derubbio et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran
as 1:2018cv05306
Plaintiff:
jessica derubbio, Zamani Davis, Kim Chang and others
Defendant:
The Islamic Republic of Iran and Islamic Republic of Iran
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333
United States of America v. Warren
as 17-3866
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
David Jones, AKA Smiz, Sidney Wilson, I-Rule, Joseph Baker, AKA Sincere, AKA Sin, Charles Williams and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Elson Warren, AKA "L", AKA 10 Percent
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv02821
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv06002
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
