Cases 41 - 50 of 96
Currie v. Graham
as 19-2030
Petitioner / Appellant:
James E. Currie
Respondent / Appellee:
Harold D. Graham
Abrahams et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11519
Plaintiff:
Peter Cullen, Duwayne Tinsley, Joseph Cerrato and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605
Boyette v. Bojangles', Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv11697
Defendant:
John E. Currie, Bojangles', Inc., Steven M. Tadler and others
Plaintiff:
Darrell Boyette
Purdessy v. Bojangles', Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv11649
Defendant:
John E. Currie, Bojangles', Inc., Steven M. Tadler and others
Plaintiff:
Reba Purdessy
Curry v. Mitchell et al
as 1:2018cv04914
Plaintiff:
Pamela Curry
Defendant:
Victor Dewayne Mitchell and Victor Dewayne Mitchell, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Curry v. Curry et al
as 1:2018cv04583
Defendant:
Kevin Curry and Kevin Curry, Jr.
Plaintiff:
Pamela A. Curry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Curry v. State of Connecticut On Human's Rights and Opportunities
as 1:2018cv04584
Plaintiff:
Pamela Ann Curry
Defendant:
State of Connecticut On Human's Rights and Opportunities
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
United States of America v. Winick (Sahachaisere)
as 18-2200
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Sandy Winick, AKA Jerry Sarrano, AKA John Peter Smith, AKA Abdiel Vergara, AKA Robin Cheer, AKA Glen Forman, AKA Kyle Bendford, AKA Stephen Thompson, Gregory Curry, Kolt Curry, AKA Michael East and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Songkram Roy Sahachaisere
Curry v. State of Connecticut On Human's Rights and Opportunities
as 1:2018cv04221
Plaintiff:
Pamela Ann Curry
Defendant:
State of Connecticut On Human's Rights and Opportunities
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01765
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
