Other Statutes Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 305
Savage v. Epizyme, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv06165
Plaintiff: Alexander Savage
Defendant: Epizyne, Inc., Grant Bogle, David M. Mott and others
Stein v. Epizyme, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv05934
Plaintiff: Shiva Stein
Defendant: Epizyme, Inc., Ken Bate, Roy A. Beveridge, M.D. and others
Wang v. Epizyme, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv06031
Plaintiff: Elaine Wang
Defendant: Epizyme, Inc., Ken Bate, Roy A. Beveridge, M.D. and others
Mohamed Chbani v. Epizyme, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv06432
Plaintiff: Mohamed Chbani
Defendant: Epizyme, Inc., Michael F. Giordano, Pablo Legorreta and others
In Re: Grant
as 3:2022mc00065
United States of America v. Aquart (Azibo Aquart)
as 21-2763
Appellee: United States of America
Defendant: Azikiwe Aquart, AKA Zee, Nathaniel Grant, AKA Correctional Officer Stone and Efrain Johnson
Defendant / Appellant: Azibo Aquart, AKA D., AKA Dreddy, AKA Jumbo, AKA Azibo Smith, AKA Azibo Siwatu Jahi Smith
Jadlow v. Danker et al
as 1:2022cv06290
Plaintiff: Todd Jadlow
Defendant: Timothy R Danker, Raffaele Sadun, Donald Britton and others
United States of America v. Forbes
as 22-1651
Appellee: United States of America
Defendant: Winston Banner, AKA Conroy Porchman, AKA Cisco, Kevin Pierre, AKA Jimmy Grant, AKA P.B. and Damon Shallow, AKA Romello
Defendant / Appellant: Dennis Forbes
Johnson v. Epizyme, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv06294
Plaintiff: William Johnson
Defendant: Epizyme, Inc., Grant Bogle, David M. Mott and others
Women of Color for Equal Justice et al v. The City of New York We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv02234
Plaintiff: Women of Color for Equal Justice, Remo DELLO IOIO, ELIZABETH LOIACONO and others
Defendant: The City of New York, Eric L. Adams, Department of Health and Mental Hygiene and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?