Cases 41 - 50 of 456
Maschhoff v. Polished.com Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv06606
Plaintiff:
Ryan Maschhoff
Defendant:
Polished.com Inc., Douglas T. Moore, Robert D. Barry and others
Petitioner:
Anthony Porraro, Eden Alpha CI LP and Ari Gold
United States of America v. Moore
as 22-2805
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Stacy Calhoun, AKA Hauss
Defendant / Appellant:
Lamar Moore, AKA Kane
Moore v. EVO Payments, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv08518
Plaintiff:
Jon Moore
Defendant:
EVO Payments, Inc., Rafik R. Sidhom, James G. Kelly and others
Moore v. iRobot Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv08445
Plaintiff:
Jon Moore
Defendant:
iRobot Corporation, Colin Angle, Mohamad Ali and others
Jacobs v. Surrogate's Court, Queens County and Kings County et al
as 1:2022cv05903
Plaintiff:
Gladys Jacobs
Defendant:
Surrogate's Court, Queens County and Kings County, Gerard J. Sweeney, Lois M. Rosenblatt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv08335
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Hajati et al v. Raisolsadati
as 1:2022cv07849
Plaintiff:
Mehdi Hajati, Kylie Moore-Gilbert and Hamid Babaei
Defendant:
Sayyid Ebrhaim Raisolsadati
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1350 Alien Tort Claims Act
Moore v. Duke Realty Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv07837
Plaintiff:
Jon Moore
Defendant:
Duke Realty Corporation, Scott P. Anderson, John P. Case and others
Carr et al v. Becerra
as 3:2022cv00988
Plaintiff:
Deborah Carr, Brenda Moore, Mary Ellen Wilson and others
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
United States of America v. Julius (Hill)
as 22-1544
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Tommy Julius, AKA General, AKA J., Carl Merrit, AKA C., Brian K. Backman, AKA B., AKA NYB, AKA New York B and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Shawn Hill, AKA SB
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
