Other Statutes Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 51 - 60 of 110
Baker vs Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., et al
as 3:2018cv00798
Plaintiff: Barry Baker
Defendant: Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Erez Vigodman, Eyal Desheh and others
Movant: Mason Slaine, Teva Investor Group, Abraham Cohen and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
County of Oneida, New York v. Purdue Pharma, L.P. et al
as 6:2018cv00314
Plaintiff: County of Oneida, New York
Defendant: Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc., Mallinckrodt, LLC, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
County of Onondaga, New York v. Purdue Pharma, L.P. et al
as 5:2018cv00100
Defendant: Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc., Mallinckrodt, LLC, McKesson Corporation and others
Plaintiff: County of Onondaga, New York
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Teamster Local 237 Retirees' Benefit Fund, et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P., et al
as 1:2018cv00336
Defendant: Purdue Pharma L.P., Purdue Pharma Inc., The Purdue Frederick Company, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Teamsters Local 237 Retirees' Benefit Fund and Teamsters Local 237 Welfare Fund
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Teamsters Local 671 Health Services and Insurance Plan v. Purdue Pharma, LP et al
as 3:2017cv02093
Plaintiff: Teamsters Local 671 Health Services and Insurance Plan
Defendant: Purdue Pharma, LP, Purdue Pharma Inc., Purdue Frederick Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
IBEW Local 90 Benefits Plan v. Purdue Pharma, LP et al
as 3:2017cv02095
Plaintiff: IBEW Local 90 Benefits Plan
Defendant: Purdue Pharma, LP, Purdue Pharma Inc., Purdue Frederick Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
OZ ELS Master Fund, Ltd. et al v. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. et al
as 3:2017cv01314
Plaintiff: OZ ELS Master Fund, Ltd. , OZ Special Funding (OZMD), L.P. , OZ Enhanced Master Fund, Ltd. and others
Defendant: Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. , Erez Vigodman , Eyal Desheh and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Ontario Teachers' Pension Plan Board, et al v. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv00558
Plaintiff: Galmi, Amram Galmi, Anchorage Police & Fire Retirement System and others
Defendant: Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd, Deborah Griffin, BBVA Securities, Inc. and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: Franklin Investors Securities Trust, Franklin Templeton Investments Corp., Franklin Templeton Investment Funds and others
Interested Party: East 71, Ltd., Brahman Partners II, L.P., Brahman Partners III, L.P. and others
Petitioner: Waterford Township Police and Fire Retirement System, Barry Baker, Public School Teachers Pension and Retirement System of Chicago and others
Consolidated Defendant: Shlomo Yanai, Yitzhak Peterburg, Yaacov Altman and others
Intervenor: United States of America and HMG Global Initiative Inc.
Intervenor Plaintiff: Certain funds and accounts managed by TIAA-CREF Investment Management LLC and Teachers Advisors LLC, TIAA-CREF Investment Management LLC, TIAA-CREF Investment Management LLC on behalf of certain of its managed funds and accounts and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Leone v. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. et al
as 3:2017cv00559
Plaintiff: Anthony Leone
Defendant: Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Erez Vigodman, Eyal Desheh and others
Movant: Ontario Teachers' Pension Plan Board
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Sergeants Benevolent Association Health & Welfare Fund v. Actavis Elizabeth, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv00980
Plaintiff: Sergeants Benevolent Association Health & Welfare Fund and American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees District Council 37 Health & Security Plan
Defendant: Actavis Elizabeth, LLC, Breckenridge Pharmaceutical, Inc., Heritage Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?