Cases 1 - 10 of 170
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02582
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Psagot Mutual Funds, Ltd. et al v. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. et al
as 3:2023cv01211
Plaintiff:
Psagot Mutual Funds, Ltd., Psagot Provident Funds & Pension Ltd., Migdal Mutual Funds, Ltd. and others
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals Industries Ltd., Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Erez Vigodman and others
Macher v. Price-Boreland et al
as 3:2023cv01260
Plaintiff:
Vorcelia Oliphant Macher
Defendant:
Maureen Price-Boreland and Peter J. Macher
Bhavsar et al. v. Marsh et al
as 1:2023cv09452
Plaintiff:
Denish Bhavsar and Samhita Gera
Defendant:
Andrew Marsh, Paul B. Middleton, David Mindnich and others
Nominal Defendant:
Plug Power Inc.
Peterson v. Islamic Republic of Iran
as 15-690
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Deborah D. Peterson, personal representative of the Estate of James C. Knipple, Terry Abbott, John Robert Allman and others
Severino v. Spagnola et al
as 3:2022cv01529
Plaintiff:
Mr. Dillon Severino and Dillon Severino
Defendant:
Fernando Spagnola, Ned Lamont, James Rovella and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Niese et al v. AllianceBernstein L.P. et al
as 1:2011cv04538
Defendant:
Raymond James Financial Services, Inc., TMS/ITS SETT A/C For HFF I LLC, CIM XVI LLC and others
Plaintiff:
John T. Nash, Robert T. Grant, John J. Zakarian and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Carol E Newman, Cutler Group, LP and Cassandra Trading Group LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr Notice of Removal
Ontario Teachers' Pension Plan Board, et al v. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. et al
as 3:2017cv00558
Plaintiff:
Galmi, Amram Galmi, Anchorage Police & Fire Retirement System and others
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd, Deborah Griffin, BBVA Securities, Inc. and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Franklin Investors Securities Trust, Franklin Templeton Investments Corp., Franklin Templeton Investment Funds and others
Interested Party:
East 71, Ltd., Brahman Partners II, L.P., Brahman Partners III, L.P. and others
Petitioner:
Waterford Township Police and Fire Retirement System, Barry Baker, Public School Teachers Pension and Retirement System of Chicago and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Shlomo Yanai, Yitzhak Peterburg, Yaacov Altman and others
Intervenor:
United States of America and HMG Global Initiative Inc.
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Certain funds and accounts managed by TIAA-CREF Investment Management LLC and Teachers Advisors LLC, TIAA-CREF Investment Management LLC, TIAA-CREF Investment Management LLC on behalf of certain of its managed funds and accounts and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Donohue v. Madison
as 22-437
Petitioner:
Danny Donohue, as President of the Civil Service Employees Association, Inc., Local 1000, Civil Service Employees Association, Inc., Local 1000, AFSCME, AFL - CIO, John Dellio, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Respondent:
Thomas J. Madison, Jr., Individually and in his official capacity as Executive Director of the New York State Thruway Authority and the New York State Canal Corporation, Carlos Millan, in his official capacity as Director of Employee Relations and Employee Safety, New York State Thruway Authority and New York State Canal Corporation, Howard P. Milstein, Individually and in his official capacity as Chairman of New York State Thruway/Canal Corporation Board of Directors and others
Dowe v. Prudential Financial Inc.
as 21-3069
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Maureen Dowe, individually and on behalf of those Class Members similarly situated, Elvie Moore and Esther Buckram
Defendant / Appellee:
Leeds, Morelli and Brown PC, Leeds, Morelli and Brown LLP, Lenard Leeds and others
Defendant:
Prudential Financial Inc., successor to Prudential Securities Inc., Leeds and Morelli, Gerald E. Harper and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
