Other Statutes Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 63
Lema-Tenesaca v. Garland
as 24-1118
Petitioner: MARTIN SEBASTIAN LEMA-TENESACA, CARLA DANIELA QUIZHPI-FAICAN and DOMENICA ISABELLA LEMA-QUIZHPI
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00728
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00216
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00212
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Enriquez-Maldonado v. Garland
as 24-97
Petitioner: CARLA FILOMENA ENRIQUEZ-MALDONADO and BRITHANY ARIANNA CONDO-ENRIQUEZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv00514
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
O'Dell v. Ruth's Hospitality Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv04253
Plaintiff: Ryan O'Dell
Defendant: Ruth's Hospitality Group, Inc., Cheryl Henry, Robin P. Selati and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00513
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Tracy v. Everything Breaks Inc.
as 3:2023cv00790
Plaintiff: Carla Tracy
Defendant: Everything Breaks Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Wolfe v. Ruth's Hospitality Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv04172
Plaintiff: Russell Wolfe
Defendant: Ruth's Hospitality Group, Inc., Cheryl Henry, Robin P. Selati and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?