Cases 1 - 10 of 489
Tipoo v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00131
Plaintiff:
Mohammed A. Tipoo
Defendant:
Portfolio Recovery Associates LLC and Corrections Officers John Does 1-25
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452 R&R re motions to remand (non-core)
Torres v. Adult Probation
as 23-8084
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY TORRES
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICE OF ADULT PROBATION, Court Support Services (CSSD) Connecticut Superior Court, State of Connecticut, NICOLE GRELLA, COURTNEY RING and others
Defendant:
JOHN DOES, 1-25 and OFFICE OF THE CHIEF COURT ADMINISTRATOR, Supreme Court Building, State of Connecticut
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv07724
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv06096
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00419
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00402
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Vyacheslav et al v. The Schutzer Group, PLLC et al
as 1:2023cv02166
Plaintiff:
TKACH VYACHESLAV and EKATERINA BALAKIREVA
Defendant:
THE SCHUTZER GROUP, PLLC and John Does 1-25
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01678
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01527
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
