Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. S&N NYC, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv07830
Plaintiff:
Government Employees Insurance Company, GEICO Indemnity Company, GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Defendant:
S&N NYC, Inc. doing business as Colden Pharmacy, Shamir Dzhurayev and John Doe Defendants Nos. "1" - "5"
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. Nassau Queens Medical P.C. et al
as 2:2020cv04328
Defendant:
Sun Joo Kim, P.T., Tonuca Basu, M.D., Yuri Choi, L.Ac. and others
Plaintiff:
GEICO Indemnity Co., GEICO General Insurance Company, Government Employees Insurance Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
In Re: SSA Bonds Antitrust Lit
as 20-1759
Defendant:
John Doe Defendants Nos. 1-100, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Incorporated, Barclays Services Limited and others
Plaintiff:
Sheet Metal Workers Pension Plan of Northern California, Irving Firemen's Relief and Retirement Fund, City of Riviera Beach Police Officers' Pension Fund, on behalf of itself and all otrhers similarly situated and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Alaska Permanent Fund Corporation, Alaska Department of Revenue, Treasury Division and Iron Workers Pension Plan of Western Pennsylvania, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank, Deutsche Bank AG, Bank of America, N.A. and others
Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. Mount Sinai Medical Supply, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv02146
Defendant:
John Doe Defendants Nos. 1-10, Mount Sinai Medical Supply, Inc. and Arsen Davydov
Plaintiff:
GEICO Indemnity Company, GEICO Casualty Company, GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. East Flatbush Medical, P.C. et al
as 1:2020cv01695
Defendant:
Mohamed Tharwat Momahed Aly, P.T., VP Chiropractic Adjustment, P.C., NGM Acupuncture, P.C. and others
Plaintiff:
GEICO General Insurance Company, GEICO Casualty Company, GEICO Indemnity Company and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. Ciancimino et al
as 1:2019cv03933
Defendant:
AYM Physical Therapy, P.C., Sound Spine Chiropractic, P.C., A.C. Medical, P.C. and others
Plaintiff:
GEICO Indemnity Company, GEICO Casualty Company, GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. Healthy Age Medical, P.C. et al
as 1:2019cv02398
Defendant:
Freedom Physical Therapy, P.C., Green Land Acupuncture, P.C., Jianfeng Zheng, L.Ac. and others
Plaintiff:
GEICO General Insurance Company, GEICO Indemnity Company, Government Employees Insurance Company and others
Interested Party:
Reliable CPM Surgical Supplies Inc
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. A.R.A Medical Care, P.C. et al
as 1:2018cv02852
Defendant:
BNL Acupuncture, P.C., Horizon PT Care, P.C., Hands on Physical Therapy Care, P.C. and others
Plaintiff:
Geico Indemnity Company, Geico Casualty Company, Geico General Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. Villano et al
as 1:2017cv07572
Defendant:
Gill Castro, Direct Chiropractic Care, P.C., John Doe Defendants "1 - 10" and others
Plaintiff:
GEICO Casualty Company, GEICO General Insurance Company, Geico Indemnity Company and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. Mauro, D.C. et al
as 1:2017cv06131
Defendant:
John Doe Defendants Nos. "1"-"10", Stone Chiropractic, P.C., Maximum Chiropractic, P.C. and others
Plaintiff:
Geico Indemnity Company,, Geico Casualty Company, Geico General Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
