Cases 1 - 10 of 17
In the Matter of a Deposition Subpoena Served in METAx LLC v. Meta Platforms, Inc.
as 1:2024mc00599
Plaintiff:
METAx LLC
Defendant:
Meta Platforms Inc.
Petitioner:
Beige Key LLC
Cause Of Action: M 94 Other
Shukla v. Meta Platforms Inc.
as 24-3126
Petitioner:
ASHU SHUKLA
Respondent:
DELOITTE CONSULTING LLP and META PLATFORMS, INC.
Shukla v. Meta Platforms Inc.
as 24-3129
Respondent:
DELOITTE CONSULTING LLP and META PLATFORMS, INC.
Petitioner:
ASHU SHUKLA
Abadi v. Adams
as 24-1608
Plaintiff:
AARON ABADI
Defendant:
ERIC ADAMS, in his personal capacity, THE CITY OF NEW YORK, BILL DE BLASIO, in his personal capacity and others
Shukla v. Deloitte Consulting LLP
as 24-539
Petitioner:
ASHU SHUKLA
Respondent:
DELOITTE CONSULTING LLP and META PLATFORMS, INC.
Este-Green v. Meta Platform, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Donna Este-Green, DE Green and Donna Green
Defendant:
Meta Platform, Inc. its successors and assigns doing business as Meta, Facebook, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 45 Federal Trade Commission Act
Woodhouse v. Meta Platforms, Inc.
as 23-7973
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BENJAMIN WOODHOUSE, ESQ.
Defendant / Appellee:
META PLATFORMS, INC., ALPHABET INC., GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP and others
Shukla v. Deloitte Consulting LLP
as 23-7878
Petitioner:
ASHU SHUKLA
Respondent:
DELOITTE CONSULTING LLP and META PLATFORMS, INC.
Dean v. Rescue Dogs Rescue Soldiers Corp. et al
as 3:2023cv01370
Plaintiff:
Arlene Dean
Defendant:
Rescue Dogs Rescue Soldiers Corp., Glen Wild Animal Rescue Corp., El-Liza's Dog House Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Woodhouse v. Meta Platforms Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv07000
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Woodhouse, Esq.
Defendant:
Meta Platforms Inc., Alphabet Inc., Nike Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ra Fed. Question: Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
