Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Wang v. Sovos Brands, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv07883
Plaintiff:
Elaine Wang
Defendant:
Sovos Brands, Inc., Todd R. Lachman, William R. Johnson and others
Le v. Sovos Brands, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv08364
Plaintiff:
Phuong Le
Defendant:
Sovos Brands, Inc., William Johnson, Todd Lachman and others
Bushansky v. Sovos Brands, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv08321
Plaintiff:
Stephen Bushansky
Defendant:
Sovos Brands, Inc., Todd R. Lachman, Neha U. Mathur and others
O'Dell v. Sovos Brands, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv07784
Plaintiff:
Ryan O'Dell
Defendant:
Sovos Brands, Inc., Todd R. Lachman, William R. Johnson and others
Knight v. Rolleri et al
as 3:2022cv01482
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Knight
Defendant:
John M. Rolleri and Ryan C. Sheppard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Roberts et al v. Ehrlich et al
as 1:2022cv09590
Plaintiff:
Shaun Roberts and Ken Sheppard
Defendant:
Stephen Ehrlich, Gerard Hanshe, David Brosgol and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Rolleri & Sheppard CPAS, LLP et al v. Knight et al
as 3:2022cv01269
Plaintiff:
Rolleri & Sheppard CPAS,LLP, John M. Rolleri, Ryan C. Sheppard and others
Defendant:
Michael J. Knight and Darlene M. Knight
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties
Rolleri et al v. Rolleri & Sheppard CPAS, LLP et al
as 3:2022cv01268
Plaintiff:
John M. Rolleri and Ryan C. Sheppard
Defendant:
Rolleri & Sheppard CPAS, LLP and Michael J. Knight
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Ivery v. Baldauf
as 21-1474
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Dwayne Ivery
Defendant:
Ricky J. Harris, Jr., James M. Sheppard and City of Rochester
Defendant / Appellee:
Alexander C. Baldauf
United States of America v. Conyers (Moye)
as 21-1022
Defendant:
Corey Canteen, Ramel Matthews, AKA Rah, Michael Brown, AKA Mighty and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Jason Moye, AKA Tall Jay
Appellee:
United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
