Cases 31 - 40 of 86
Doe v. Fitzgerald et al
as 2:2019cv04898
Defendant:
James Roes 1-25, John Fitzgerald and Hudson Valley Charter Service, Inc.
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Doe 1 et al v. Jeffrey Epstein et al
as 1:2019cv07675
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2
Defendant:
Estate of Jeffrey Epstein, Sue Roe and Roes 2-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 pi
Doe et al v. New England Fertility Institute et al
as 1:2019cv01461
Defendant:
New England Fertility Institute and M.D. Gad Lavy
Plaintiff:
John Doe and Richard Roe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402 Medical Malpractice
Roe v. Hotchkiss School
as 3:2018cv01701
Defendant:
The Hotchkiss School and Hotchkiss School
Plaintiff:
Richard Roe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Doe v. Maier et. al.
as 2:2018cv04956
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE
Defendant:
Brennan Becker, James Roes 1-25, Gavin Yingling and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Quilambaqui v. Men At Work Construction Corp. et al
as 2:2018cv04824
Plaintiff:
Luis Quilambaqui
Defendant:
Men At Work Construction Corp. and El Squid Roe LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Kashef v. BNP Paribas S.A.
as 18-1304
Plaintiff:
Shadika G. Hassan
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Entesar Osman Kashef, Alfadel Mosabal, Abubakar Abakar and others
Defendant - Appellee:
BNP Paribas S.A., a French corporation, BNP Paribas North America, Inc., a Deleware corporation, Does 1-10 and others
Prendi v. City of New York et al
as 1:2018cv01028
Plaintiff:
Rubin Prendi
Defendant:
City of New York , The New York City Police Department , Port Authority of New York & New Jersey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Doe v. Roe
as 7:2017cv06029
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
John Roe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Doe v. Roe
as 2:2017cv02911
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Jane Roe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
