Cases 101 - 110 of 500
Melendez et al v. Ethical Culture Fieldston School et al
as 1:2023cv04917
Plaintiff:
Cristina Melendez, YA and YS
Defendant:
Ethical Culture Fieldston School, Jessica Bagby, Kenny Graves and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 ra Race Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv06291
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03165
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03448
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans With Disabilities Act - Civil Enforcement Actions
Broecker v. New York City Department of Education
as 23-655
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Nicole Broecker, Michelle Martino, Gina Porcello and others
Defendant / Appellee:
New York City Department of Education, Meisha Porter, United Federation of Teachers, Local 2, American Federation of Teachers, AFL-CIO and others
Acosta v. The City of Peekskill Section 8 Department et al.
as 7:2023cv03106
Plaintiff:
Joseph Acosta
Defendant:
The City of Peekskill Section 8 Department and Jessica Ganus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02994
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02881
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-493
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ecock-Rotondo v. Rochester Institute of Technology
as 6:2023cv06166
Plaintiff:
Dr. Jessica L. Ecock-Rotondo, Ph.D.
Defendant:
Rochester Institute of Technology
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
