Cases 111 - 120 of 262
Wood et al v. Mutual Redevelopment Houses, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv07535
Plaintiff:
Tzvee Wood and Andrea Malester
Defendant:
Mutual Redevelopment Houses, Inc., The City of New York Department of Housing Preservation and Development, Penn South Cooperative Federal Credit Union and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Nisbeth et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv04460
Plaintiff:
Andre Bonds, Amanda Cruz, Diana Letryz and others
Defendant:
City of New York, Michael Hotaling, John and Jane Doe 1 Through 10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv03518
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2014cv03509
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Maya v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv03170
Plaintiff:
Tony Maya
Defendant:
The City of New York, Morris and John Doe #1-5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-1436
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Morris v. City of New York
as 14-1187
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Peggy Morris
Defendant - Appellee:
City of New York, Deputy Inspector Krystal Johnson, Sergeant Edward Silvestre and others
Morris v. City of New York
as 14-1188
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Peggy Morris
Defendant - Appellee:
City of New York, Krystal Johnson, Edward Silvestre and others
Morris v. New York City et al
as 1:2014cv01749
Defendant:
Chief Phillip Banks, III, POM Kyle Bradley, Carlton Brown and others
407) 323-4276 (fax:
Peggy Morris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-260
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant-Counter-Claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
