Cases 151 - 160 of 103,206
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02091
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01988
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Tarrant et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv02011
Plaintiff:
Patrick Tarrant and TPH-PROJECT SERVICES, LLC
Defendant:
THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Department of Buildings of the City of New York, Ashraf Omran and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp Civil Right Denial of Due Process
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03663
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12132 Americans with Disabilities Act - Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03666
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12132 Americans with Disabilities Act - Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03697
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12132 Americans with Disabilities Act - Discrimination
White v. City of Utica et al
as 6:2024cv00655
Plaintiff:
Daryll White
Defendant:
City of Utica, Utica Police Department, P.O. Joseph Dare #1962 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jiang v. China Southern Airline Company Limited; et al
as 1:2024cv03558
Plaintiff:
Ziyao Jiang
Defendant:
China Southern Airline Company Limited;, Ministry of State of the P.R China and State Security Bureau of Guangzhou City
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Williams v. Saks Fifth Avenue Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv03701
Plaintiff:
Emanuel Williams
Defendant:
Saks Fifth Avenue Corporation and Tyler Groff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
