Cases 11 - 20 of 143
Portillo v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 2:2023cv02407
Plaintiff:
Maria Elena Portillo
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Futia v. Roberts et al
as 7:2023cv01774
Plaintiff:
Anthony J. Futia, Jr.
Defendant:
Raymond Roberts, Douglas O'Donnell, Bank of Greene County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1932 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Dames v. JP Morgan Chase & Co. et al
as 1:2022cv06962
Plaintiff:
Marquis Dames
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase & Co., JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. and Noemi Graham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Rimini v. J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. et al
as 1:2022cv07768
Plaintiff:
Thomas Rimini
Defendant:
J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., JPMorgan Securities, LLC, JPMorgan Chase Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv06696
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04407
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans With Disabilities Act - Civil Enforcement Actions
Rosu v. The Town of Oyster Bay et al
as 2:2022cv03073
Plaintiff:
Doina Rosu and Doina Almazon
Defendant:
The Town of Oyster Bay and JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Curtis v. Evans et al
as 6:2022cv06234
Plaintiff:
Alexander J. Curtis
Defendant:
Malik Evans, Ofc. Flint, Todd Baxter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02145
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Washington v. Chase Bank N.A. et al
as 1:2022cv01540
Plaintiff:
Sandra A. Washington
Defendant:
Chase Bank N.A., JP Morgan Chase and Todd Steinhaus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
