Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv03641
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Hsu et al v. Braun et al
as 1:2017cv01828
Plaintiff:
Paul Hsu and Cathy Huang
Defendant:
Richard F. Braun and Miriam A. Boggio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sen v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2017cv00744
Plaintiff:
Binijuktya Sen
Defendant:
The City Of New York, Xinping Huang, Chrstopher Siani and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gomez v. City of New York et al
as 1:2016cv06185
Defendant:
City of New York, William Huang, John and Jane Doe 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
Victor Gomez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Colindres v. County of Westchester, New York et al
as 1:2016cv03013
Plaintiff:
Marlon Colindres
Defendant:
County of Westchester, New York, Westchester Medical Center, Cheryl Archbald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv01263
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00336
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv04233
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv02597
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Huang(Nancy) v. Organizer Signal Scope Sender with Receiver et al
as 1:2012cv00796
Defendant:
Chase Bank (branch) transfer money violation, Yun Hong (studio voice set up), Organizer Chinese East Restaurant and Sheng Jing Restaurant and others
Plaintiff:
Nanyan Huang(Nancy)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
