Cases 11 - 16 of 16
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv09980
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kuck v. Danaher
as 12-4497
Plaintiff - Appellant:
M. Peter Kuck, Individually & on behalf of others similarly situated and James F. Goldberg, Individually & on behalf of others similarly situated
Defendant:
M. Jodi Rell, I/O, Governor, State of Connecticut, Susan Mazzoccoli, I/O, Executive Head, Connecticut State Department of Administrative Services and James M. Thomas, I/O Connecticut Department of Public Safety
Defendant - Appellee:
Albert J. Masek, Commanding Officer Connecticut Department of Public Safety, John A. Danaher, III, I/O Commander Connecticut Department of Public Safety, Alaric Fox, Captain, Connecticut State Depart of Public Safety and others
Williams-Bey et al v. The Commissioners of Elections in the City of New York et al
as 1:2012cv03836
Plaintiff:
T. Williams-Bey, Niyyirah El and Mark Escoffery-Bey
Defendant:
The Commissioners of Elections in the City of New York, Maria R. Guastella, Frederic M. Umane and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Balice v. Internal Revenue Service
as 11-5064
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Luigi Balice and Lillian Balice
Defendant - Appellee:
Internal Revenue Service, Department of the Treasury, T. Williams, IRS Agent, Audrey Land, IRS Agent and others
Balice et al v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 1:2011cv02552
Plaintiff:
Luigi Balice and Lillian Balice
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service, T. Williams, Audrey Land and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams Bey et al v. The Commissioners of Elections Constituting the Board of Elections in the City of New York
as 1:2009cv07560
Plaintiff:
Brother T. Williams Bey, Niyyirrah El, Juan Antonio Martinez, Sr. and others
Defendant:
The Commissioners of Elections Constituting the Board of Elections in the City of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
