Civil Rights Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 35
Ash v. Sterling National Bank et al
as 1:2015cv08342
Plaintiff: Jay Ash
Defendant: Sterling National Bank, N.Y. National Bank and M. Futterman Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Modica v. Eastern Savings Bank, FSB et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv01384
Defendant: Esq. Karina Alomar, Esq. Karamvir Dahiya, Eastern Savings Bank, FSB and others
Plaintiff: Anthony Modica
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Stone et al v. Popular Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv05312
Plaintiff: Christine Stone, David Kevin Shanyfelt, Jeanette P. Bowen and others
Defendant: Popular Inc., Popular ABS, Inc., The Bank of New York Mellon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv03243
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2013cv03497
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv04861
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00162
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Chang v. Sterling Bancorp et al
as 1:2011cv02926
Defendant: Michael Bizenov, Adam Dejak, Sterling Bancorp and others
Plaintiff: Tony Chang
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv03408
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00475
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?