Cases 31 - 40 of 93
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-538
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-530
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-192
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-226
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv07298
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
Lamont v. Edwards
as 16-2792
Plaintiff - Appellant:
P. Stephen Lamont, individually and as Nominee of 100% of the Capital Shares of Arumai Holdings, Inc.
Defendant - Appellee:
Ann Edwards, in her individual and official capacity, Ramonita Reyes, in her individual and official capacity, Marsha Brown - Mitchell, in her individual and official capacity and others
Defendant:
Frank R. Alvarez, in his individual and official capacity, Laura Slack, in her individual and official capacity, Rye City School District and others
Welch v. City of Rochester et al
as 6:2016cv06520
Plaintiff:
Travis Welch
Defendant:
City of Rochester, Rochester Police Department, Patrick Giancursio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norford v. Rochester et al
as 6:2016cv06478
Defendant:
City of Rochester, Police Department of the City of Rochester, Patrick Giancursio and others
Plaintiff:
Brian A Norford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv03532
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
D'Angelo v. Morganthau et al
as 1:2016cv02229
Plaintiff:
Philip D'Angelo
Defendant:
Robert M. Morganthau, Wagner and New York County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
