Cases 41 - 50 of 210
Amelio v. Morris
as 7:2019cv04488
Plaintiff:
Carmine P. Amelio
Defendant:
Cecelia G. Morris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv
Perso v. Perso et al
as 2:2019cv02858
Defendant:
Dawn Garrett, Honorable David Morris, Robert Montefusco and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Perso
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lee et al v. The City of Troy et al
as 1:2019cv00473
Defendant:
Sergeant "John" Barker, Patrolman "John" Morris, Patrolman Kyle Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Lamont Lee and Tymel Kornegay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Greenport Gardens, LLC et al v. Village of Greenport et al
as 2:2019cv02330
Defendant:
Greg Morris, Douglas W. Roberts, Village of Greenport and others
Plaintiff:
Greenport Gardens, LLC, Mario Capuano and Kevin C. Hudson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Bowman v. Morris
as 8:2019cv00097
Defendant:
Honorable Cecily L. Morris
Plaintiff:
Robert G. Bowman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv07231
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv06885
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv08213
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Morris-Mendoza v. City of New York et al
as 1:2018cv04127
Plaintiff:
Eric Morris-Mendoza
Defendant:
Police Officers John and Jane Does 1-5, City of New York and Steve Franzel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Demuth v. New York State Police et al
as 3:2018cv00796
Defendant:
INV. R. Quick, Senior INV. Kiltpatrick, Town of Norwich and others
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Demuth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
