Cases 41 - 50 of 87
Shaw v. City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv01239
Plaintiff:
Quamir Shaw
Defendant:
City of New York, James Gatto and John and Jane Doe 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sinclair v. City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv00590
Plaintiff:
Kai Sinclair
Defendant:
City of New York , Christopher Shaw and John and Jane Doe 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00591
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Shaw v. Merit Systems Protection Board et al
as 1:2014cv05856
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Daniel Shaw
Defendant:
Robert A. McDonald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00257
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Langdon et al v. The County of Columbia et al
as 1:2013cv00842
Plaintiff:
Frank Dinehart Langdon and Grant Dinehart Langdon
Defendant:
The County of Columbia , Paul Proper, Jr. , Carl Whitbeck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv03862
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Shaw v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2013cv03205
Plaintiff:
Russell Shaw
Defendant:
The City of New York, Nicholas Budney and John Doe(s) #s 1-3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shaw et al v. The City Of New York , et al
as 1:2013cv02438
Plaintiff:
Christopher Shaw and Lamar Bundy
Defendant:
The City Of New York, New York City Police Department, Police Officer Syed Ali and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2012cv01794
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
