Cases 51 - 60 of 75
Cabiness v. Lopresti et al
as 1:2011cv00635
Plaintiff:
Julian Cabiness
Defendant:
Charles Lopresti and Unidentified Police Officers of the 103rd Precinct
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frederick v. New York City et al
as 1:2011cv00469
Plaintiff:
Kelby Frederick
Defendant:
New York City, Mark Lobel, McDermott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kim v. New York City et al
as 1:2010cv09316
Plaintiff:
Edward Kim
Defendant:
New York City, Police Officer and Unidentified Police Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Butler v. New York City et al
as 1:2010cv07974
Plaintiff:
Duchaun Butler
Defendant:
New York City, Humberto Kibel, Layton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. City of New York
as 10-3877
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Levon Smith
Defendant - Appellee:
City of New York, Jorge Tobon, Police Officer, Shield #29637, Heribert Bermudez, Police Officer, Shield # 30246 and others
Rowe et al v. New York City et al
as 1:2010cv05058
Plaintiff:
Davial Rowe and Nagi Benson
Defendant:
New York City, Richard Mack, Douglas L. Graham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Connor-Lucas v. New York City et al
as 1:2010cv02863
Plaintiff:
Corinne Connor-Lucas
Defendant:
New York City , Unidentified Police Officers and The City of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bailey et al v. Garay et al
as 1:2010cv02851
Plaintiff:
Dominique T. Bailey and Danique Love-Billy
Defendant:
Brian Garay , Santiago, Unidentified Police Officers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pion v. City of New York et al
as 1:2010cv02499
Plaintiff:
Rafael Pion
Defendant:
City of New York, John Doe and Several Unidentified Police Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. New York City et al
as 1:2009cv10106
Plaintiff:
Carl D. Jones, Sr.
Defendant:
New York City and Unidentified Police Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
