Cases 61 - 70 of 97
Chapdelaine v. Duncan et al
as 3:2014cv01581
Plaintiff:
Darlene Anne Chapdelaine
Defendant:
Mary Duncan, John Revill, Town of Eastford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv07606
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Soriano v. City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv07538
Plaintiff:
Claudia Soriano
Defendant:
City of New York, Naikee Caballero and Michael Quinones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martinez v. Santamaria et al
as 1:2014cv07634
Plaintiff:
Juan Ramon Martinez
Defendant:
Elsie Santamaria, D. Pinto, Adult Career and Continuing Education Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Abraham v. State Of New York et al
as 1:2014cv05275
Plaintiff:
Aleyamma Abraham
Defendant:
State Of New York, Levester Cannon, Jim Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Minto v. Connecticut State Police et al
as 3:2014cv00747
Plaintiff:
Mark Minto
Defendant:
Connecticut State Police, Sarah Bruso, Claudia Tino-Tomassetti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Incorporated Village of Hempstead et al
as 2:2014cv02853
Defendant:
Det. Donald J. Bittner, P.O. Vito Buccellato, P.O. Christopher N. Cohen and others
Plaintiff:
N'Daya Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Washington et al v. Ross et al
as 7:2014cv03091
Plaintiff:
Will Washington , Joseph A. Foy II , Sheehnaz Hirji and others
Defendant:
Ronald O. Ross , Lloyd Newland , Davis Warner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00387
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Tate v. The People of The State of New York et al
as 1:2014cv02077
Plaintiff:
Earl Tate
Defendant:
The People of The State of New York, City of New York, Claudia Conway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
