Cases 61 - 66 of 66
Sorokin v. New York County District Attor
as 11-2619
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Julia Sorokin and Louis A. Bravo
Defendant - Appellee:
New York County District Attorney's Office, Cyrus Vance, Jr., in his official capacity as District Attorney of New York County, Robert Morgenthau, in his former official capacity as District Attorney of New York County and others
Morgan v. New York State Attorney General et al
as 1:2011cv03316
Plaintiff:
Michael Morgan
Defendant:
New York State Attorney General, New York City Police Department, New York City Office of Labor Relations and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sorokin et al v. New York County District Attorney's Office et al
as 1:2011cv00841
Plaintiff:
Julia Sorokin and Louis A. Bravo
Defendant:
New York County District Attorney's Office , Cyrus Vance, Jr. , Robert Morgenthau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dibbs v. Mazzarelli
as 10-4138
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Stephen Dibbs
Defendant - Appellee:
Angela Mazzarelli, Joan Lobis, New York State Office of Court Administration and others
Forjone v. The State of California
as 10-822
Plaintiff:
Wayne Mack, Dan DelPlato, Jr., Gabriel Razzano and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
John-Joseph Forjone, the 42 USC 1983/Bivens/False Claims Act matter effecting the statewide distribution of HAVA funds requiring a 28 USC 2284 panel effecting New York Municipal People's equity in Bottom-up suffrage. Homerule autonomy and effecting real p
Defendant - Appellee:
The State of California, each by the Secretary of State and the Attorney General respectively, The State of Oregon, each by the Secretary of State and the Attorney General respectively, The State of New Mexico, each by the Secretary of State and the Attorney General respectively and others
Peterec v. Johnston et al
as 1:2010cv00565
Plaintiff:
John L. Peterec
Defendant:
Camille Johnston, Steven Sitkoff, Lake Louise Marie Country Club, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
