Cases 81 - 90 of 168
Quickel v. City of White Plains
as 14-2964
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kim M. Quickel
Defendant - Appellee:
City of White Plains, Officer Miedreich, Chief of Police and others
Harrison v. United States Postal Service et al
as 1:2014cv06463
Plaintiff:
Guinette R. Harrison
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, Mohamed, Jane/ John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Melendez v. The City Of New York , et al
as 1:2014cv06024
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Melendez
Defendant:
The City Of New York, Department of Homeless Services, Judy Harrison and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv03857
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
S.H. et al v. Ardsley Union Free School District et al
as 7:2014cv04396
Plaintiff:
S.H. , R.H. , K.H. and others
Defendant:
Ardsley Union Free School District, Laura Allan, Yonathan Sokal, M. D. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01812
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01756
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Quickel v. City of White Plains et al
as 1:2014cv01858
Plaintiff:
Kim M. Quickel
Defendant:
City of White Plains, Lesilie Harrison Awakenings, Miedreich and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Russell v. The Journal News
as 14-387
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James Russell
Defendant:
The Journal News and Journal News LLC
Defendant - Appellee:
Gannett Company Inc., Gannett Satellite Information Network Inc., Joseph McDonald, Individually and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00686
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
