Civil Rights Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv05001
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00369
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Clarke v. Burger King Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv01465
Defendant: Rackson Restaurants, LLC and Burger King Corporation
Plaintiff: Atiba Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv09855
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00324
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv05423
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Range v. 154 E. 116th Street Corp. et al
as 1:2014cv02445
Plaintiff: King Range
Defendant: 154 E. 116th Street Corp. , Wings K. Leong , Robert B. Johnsen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00815
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv02782
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Nimely v. Rofar Realty Co. Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv02630
Defendant: Burger King Corporation, Consumer Food Services, LLC and Rofar Realty Co. Inc.
Plaintiff: Thomas Nimely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?