Cases 1 - 10 of 200
Bailey v. Grant et al
as 1:2024cv06044
Defendant:
Officer Estharli Lopez, Officer Joseph Walsh and Officer James Grant
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Bailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05580
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e-2e Job Discrimination (Unlawful Employment Practices)
Dunbar v. Jackson et al
as 1:2024cv04491
Defendant:
Jamira Haines, Calvin Cordozar Broadus, Jr., Leonard Carl Grant and others
Plaintiff:
Janis Lavern Dunbar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
McCarthy v. Kaplan et al
as 1:2024cv03286
Plaintiff:
Ana McCarthy
Defendant:
David Kaplan, Gabriel Clague, Samantha Clague and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv11304
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
McCarthy v. Kaplan et al
as 1:2023cv11324
Plaintiff:
Ana McCarthy
Defendant:
David Kaplan, Gabriel Clague, Samantha Clague and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Grant v. 21st Mortgage Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv08142
Plaintiff:
Andrew Grant
Defendant:
21st Mortgage Corporation and Conboy, Case, Blackmore, Maloney and Laird, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hicks v. Garramone et al
as 6:2023cv01332
Plaintiff:
Tahjer Hicks
Defendant:
Grant Garramone, Todd Carville and Scott D. McNamara
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Grant v. Acacia Network Housing, Inc.
as 1:2023cv07976
Plaintiff:
Takisha Grant
Defendant:
Acacia Network Housing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
