Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Marcial v. The City Of New York et al
as 1:2024cv03158
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Marcial
Defendant:
The City Of New York, NYPD Commissioner Keechant Sewell, PO Jonathan Galindo-Sanchez (Badge #23267, Tax Id #964005) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
King et al v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2023cv09096
Plaintiff:
Venice King and Marcus King
Defendant:
The City of New York, Police Officer Tyler A. Howe, Police Officer Ashley Ordonez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv07055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01702
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Perez v. The United States et al
as 1:2017cv07368
Defendant:
John and Jane Does #1-10, Elena Ordonez and United States of America
Plaintiff:
Juana Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv05745
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Westchester Residential Opportunities, Inc et al v. Clinton Terrace L.P. et al
as 7:2016cv09273
Plaintiff:
Westchester Residential Opportunities, Inc , Ganelle Mesquita and Veronica Ordonez
Defendant:
Clinton Terrace L.P. and Elkal Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Ordonez v. El Sabor Latino Bar and Restaurant, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv05821
Plaintiff:
Merlin Ordonez
Defendant:
El Sabor Latino Bar and Restaurant, Inc. and Antonio C Dagner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-1369
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ordonez v. Essence
as 1:2013cv02342
Plaintiff:
Edwin B. Ordonez
Defendant:
Essence A. Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity: Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
