Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Washington et al v. Darvil, et al
as 1:2024cv03069
Plaintiff:
Jeannine Campbell Washington, RockSteady Industries International LLC doing business as RSZ Media, RockSteady Recordz and others
Defendant:
Just Ice Campbell, Judges Ben Darvil, Jr., Diana Johnson and others
Debtor:
SRG-REM LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02199
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01540
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Ponce v. United States
as 22-1087
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jose Ponce
Defendant / Appellee:
United States
Ponce v. United States
as 1:2022cv02532
Plaintiff:
Jose Ponce
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 vc Fed. Question: Violation of Constitutional Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03291
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jimenez v. City of New York et al.
as 1:2019cv03242
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
SGT. Ponce, Police Officer Alamo, New York City Department of Homeless Services and others
Plaintiff:
Cindy Jimenez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mercer v. Ponce De Leon Hotel LLC
as 1:2018cv08492
Plaintiff:
Stacey Mercer
Defendant:
Ponce De Leon Hotel LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv
Olivieri v. City of New York et al
as 1:2017cv05947
Plaintiff:
Christopher Olivieri
Defendant:
City of New York, Steve Juillet, FNU (First Name Unknown) Ponce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. Ponce et al
as 1:2015cv04290
Interested Party:
City of New York
Defendant:
Michael Defilippo, John and Jane Doe 1 through 10 and Jimmy Ponce
Plaintiff:
Tony White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
