Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv08214
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv06146
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv05522
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
McFarlin v. The American Embassy in the
as 11-3769
Plaintiff:
Michael Ricardo Jeremiah Waithe, III
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Bishop Brendalee Juanita McFarlin, c/o Lynn Hovember
Defendant - Appellee:
The American Embassy in the United Kingdom on Marble Arch in London, (John Consulate), Rosemary, Head Officials under the Consulate on June 20th 2002 and others
Johnson v. Shah et al
as 1:2011cv01956
Defendant:
Americare Certified Special Services, Inc., Elizabeth R. Berlin, Robert Doar and others
Plaintiff:
Ena Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396 - Tort Negligence
Jiggetts v. Tristar Patrol Service, Inc.
as 10-3765
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kyle Jiggetts
Defendant - Appellee:
Tristar Patrol Service, Inc., Special Service Bureau and NYC Department of Citywide Administration Services
Handschu v. Special Services Division
as 10-3485
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Barbara Handschu, Ralph DiGia, Alex McKeiver and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Special Services Division, AKA Bureau of Special Services, William H.T. Smith, Arthur Grubert and others
McFarlin et al v. The American Embassy in the United Kingdom on Marble Arch in London et al
as 1:2009cv00084
Defendant:
The American Embassy in the United Kingdom on Marble Arch in London, Rosemary, Head Officials under the Consulate on June 20th 2002 and others
Plaintiff:
Brendalee Juanita McFarlin and Michael Ricardo Jeremiah Waithe, III
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
