Cases 1 - 10 of 12
A.M. et al v. French et al
as 2:2019cv00015
Plaintiff:
Selena Senesac, Jill Messineo, Roman Catholic Diocese of Burlington, Vermont and others
Defendant:
Daniel M. French and George B. Spaulding
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Townsend v. City of Corning et al
as 6:2017cv06556
Plaintiff:
Bryan Townsend
Defendant:
City of Corning, Salvatore Trentanelli, Jeffrey Spaulding and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shimburski et al v. McCarthy et al
as 1:2017cv00699
Plaintiff:
Megan Shimburski , Makenna Shimburski , John Shimburski and others
Defendant:
Gregory McCarthy, Matthew Noecker, Jack Graham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spaulding v Neufeid et al
as 1:2016cv01040
Defendant:
"John" Does, Jane Does, Figeroux & Associates and others
718) 222-3153 (fax:
Brian Figeroux
Plaintiff:
Marlon Spaulding
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Banks v. Pivnichny et al
as 3:2015cv00849
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Timothy Pivnichny, James Comey, Barack Obama and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Banks v. Pivnichny et al
as 3:2015cv00817
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Timothy Pivnichny, James Comey, Barack Obama and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Banks v. Pivnichny et al
as 3:2015cv00826
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Timothy Pivnichny, James Comey, Barack Obama and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2014cv01455
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
Spaulding v Neufeid et al
as 3:2013cv00867
Defendant:
Brian Figeroux, Figeroux & Associates, John Does and others
Plaintiff:
Marlpn Spaulding
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv03041
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
