Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Montgomery v. Holland et al
as 1:2017cv03489
Plaintiff:
Wilhelmina "Mina" Montgomery
Defendant:
Agnieszka Holland, NBC-TV, Lionsgate Entertainment and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv03809
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv03187
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Lan v. AOL Time Warner, Inc.
as 14-1654
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Sang Lan
Defendant:
AOL Time Warner, Incorporated, United States Gymnastics Federation, TIG Insurance Company and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Time Warner, Inc., Keo-Sung Liu, AKA Hui-Hung Sie, Gina Hiu-Hung Liu, individually and as trustees or managers of Goodwill For Sang Lan Fund, AKA Hui-Hung Sie, AKA Gina Liu and others
Emrit v. AOL Time Warner, Inc.
as 14-709
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant - Appellee:
AOL Time Warner, Inc., CNN Headline News and Vinnie Politan
Emrit v. AOL Time Warner, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00314
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
AOL Time Warner, Inc., CNN Headline News and Vinnie Politan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-4226
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Lan v. AOL Time Warner, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv02870
Defendant:
Gina Hiu-Hung Liu, Keo-Sung Liu, Gina Liu and others
Plaintiff:
Sang Lan
Petitioner:
former attorney Ming Hai
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tucker v. Home Box Office, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv01571
Defendant:
Bootleg Productions, Inc., Home Box Office, Inc., Terry McCallister and others
Plaintiff:
Irwin Tucker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-1389
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
