Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Arnett v. Hicks et al
as 1:2019cv04755
Defendant:
Aaron Lipson and William Hicks
Plaintiff:
Cazal Arnett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Arnett v. The Metropolitan Museum of Art et al
as 1:2019cv04072
Plaintiff:
Cazal Arnett
Defendant:
The Metropolitan Museum of Art and The Costume Institute, The Metropolitan Musuem of Art
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Arnett v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 1:2018cv11852
Plaintiff:
Cazal A. Arnett
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service and Visa USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Arnett v. Fire Department of New York et al
as 1:2018cv03909
Plaintiff:
Cazal A. Arnett
Defendant:
Fire Department of New York, New York Police Department (NYPD) and New York State (NYS)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Arnett v. Stoltenberg et al
as 1:2018cv01299
Plaintiff:
Cazal Arnett
Defendant:
Jens Stoltenberg, Curtis Scaparrotti and Denis Mercier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Arnett v. Zuckerberg et al
as 1:2018cv00839
Plaintiff:
Cazal Arnett
Defendant:
Mark Zuckerberg, Sean Parker and Sheryl Sandberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Arnett v. Sriyantraa, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv03344
Plaintiff:
Janell Arnett
Defendant:
Sriyantraa, Inc. , Srinidhhi Inc. , Hemang Champaneria and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Morales v. City of New York
as 13-2126
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Pablo Morales
Defendant:
John Does 1-10 and Jane Does 1-10
Defendant - Appellee:
City of New York, New York City Police Department, Special Agent Michael Arnett and others
Morales v. City of New York et al
as 1:2011cv05407
Plaintiff:
Pablo Morales
Defendant:
City of New York , New York City Police Dept., Michael Arnett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alexander v. Traveler's Insurance Co. et al
as 1:2007cv05843
Defendant:
Traveler's Insurance Co., Smithfield Foods, Farm Credit Leasing SVS Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Alexander
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
