Cases 91 - 100 of 63,242
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03551
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Vicente v. Ayotte et al
as 3:2024cv00844
Plaintiff:
Luis Vicente
Defendant:
Marc Ayotte, Kyle Conrad, Orlando Poventud and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elfgeeh v. USA
as 6:2024cv06283
Petitioner:
Mufid A Elfgeeh
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Welch v. Wolcott
as 1:2024cv00448
Petitioner:
Aaron Welch
Respondent:
Julie Wolcott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Malave v. Price et al
as 1:2024cv03539
Plaintiff:
Rafaela A. Malave
Defendant:
Detective Ryan Price and Judge Robert A. Schwartz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dieng v. New York City NYPD et al
as 1:2024cv01834
Plaintiff:
Babacar Dieng
Defendant:
New York City NYPD and New York City FDNY
Interested Party:
CITY OF NEW YORK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wesolek v. Erie County Holding Center et al
as 1:2024cv03521
Plaintiff:
Justin Wesolek
Defendant:
Erie County Holding Center, Eric County Sheriff Department, Kathy Hochul and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez v. Bad Boy Entertainment et al
as 1:2024cv03460
Plaintiff:
Alfredo P. Gonzalez
Defendant:
Bad Boy Entertainment and CEO Sean P. Diddy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Affranti
as 6:2024cv06172
Plaintiff:
Christopher S. Young
Defendant:
Affranti and Affronti
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Petteway v. Municipality of New London, et al
as 3:2024cv00412
Plaintiff:
Christopher Q. Petteway
Defendant:
Municipality of New London, Jeffrey Nichols and New London Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
