Cases 11 - 20 of 49
Jackson v. Acevedo et al
as 7:2020cv06655
Defendant:
Lieutenant Jhon Cannars, C.O. P. Bailey, C.O. Jhon Acevedo and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Jackson and Thomas Eli Jah Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curry v. United States of America
as 1:2020cv05039
Plaintiff:
Hennison Curry
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Shabazz v. Sharr et al
as 3:2019cv01233
Defendant:
Correction Inc., Carleton J. Giles, DeNote and others
Plaintiff:
Shaka Shabazz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. New Haven et al
as 3:2018cv02133
Defendant:
John Doe, New Haven Police Department, City of New Haven and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Evans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carzoglio v. Vollmer et al
as 7:2018cv07780
Defendant:
Jail Guard Curry, Jail Guard Olivo, Jail Guard Holoran and others
Plaintiff:
Angelo Carzoglio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curry v. Nassau County First Precinct Baldwin et al
as 2:2018cv01130
Defendant:
Michael Sierzant, Joseph Phibin, Sean Ledwith and others
Plaintiff:
Ernest Curry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curry v. Nassau County Corr. Center et al
as 2:2018cv00979
Defendant:
Nassau County Correctional Facility and Nassau County Corr. Center
Plaintiff:
Ernest Curry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curry v. Valentine et al
as 1:2017cv01319
Plaintiff:
Michael Curry
Defendant:
Captain McDonald, Warden Scott and C.O. Valentine
Interested Party:
Office of the Corporation Counsel of the City of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Currie v. Graham
as 2:2017cv01227
Plaintiff:
James E. Currie
Defendant:
Harold D. Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Valdes v. Curry et al
as 1:2016cv04347
Plaintiff:
Victor Valdes
Defendant:
Curry, Sing Sing Correctional Facility Mental Health Supervisor and Sing Sing Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
