Cases 11 - 20 of 1,146
Markeveys v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00626
Plaintiff:
Matthew Markeveys
Defendant:
Scott Semple, Maldonado, Gary Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carzoglio v. Klimek et al
as 1:2024cv02654
Plaintiff:
Angelo Carzoglio
Defendant:
Stanley Klimek, James McMahon, Kevin Krebs and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Rivera v. Doe et al
as 3:2024cv00607
Plaintiff:
Kevin Rivera
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reshard v. City of New York Dept. of Correction et al
as 1:2024cv02531
Plaintiff:
Kevin Reshard
Defendant:
City of New York Dept. of Correction, Captain Delosta, Officer Jane Doe#1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hobes v. Rodriguez et al
as 7:2024cv02484
Plaintiff:
Joshua Hobes
Defendant:
A. Rodriguez, Superintendent Edward Burnett, Kevin Fierro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marshall v. Vaughn et al
as 1:2024cv02485
Plaintiff:
James D. Marshall
Defendant:
Officer Vaughn, Parole Officer Kevin Harmer, Cosgrove and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Coons v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00534
Plaintiff:
Steven Coons
Defendant:
Semple, Arnone, Cepelak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weed v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00494
Plaintiff:
Chad Weed
Defendant:
Semple, James Dzurenda, Kevin Roy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bridges v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00452
Plaintiff:
David Bridges
Defendant:
Semple, Arnone, Angel Quiros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wiltshire v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv02312
Petitioner:
Kevin Wiltshire
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
