Cases 11 - 20 of 952
Rodriguez v. Guadarama
as 3:2024cv00644
Petitioner:
Jesus Rodriguez
Respondent:
Jesus Guadarama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Rodriguez v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00566
Plaintiff:
Christopher Rodriguez
Defendant:
Scott Semple, Edward Maldonado, Carol Chapdelaine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hobes v. Rodriguez et al
as 7:2024cv02484
Plaintiff:
Joshua Hobes
Defendant:
A. Rodriguez, Superintendent Edward Burnett, Kevin Fierro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harriott v. Annucci et al
as 1:2024cv02298
Plaintiff:
Albert Harriott
Defendant:
Anthony J. Annucci, Kathy Hochul, C. Koenigsmann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Candella v. Rodriguez et al
as 3:2024cv00483
Plaintiff:
Daniel Candella
Defendant:
Nick Rodriguez and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Irizarry v. Rodriguez
as 3:2024cv00475
Plaintiff:
Gilbert Irizarry
Defendant:
Nick Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gray v. Rodriguez
as 3:2024cv00481
Plaintiff:
Gary Gray
Defendant:
Nick Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Quiros et al
as 3:2024cv00421
Plaintiff:
Amauri Rodriguez
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Jesus Guadarramma and Robert Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arpin v. Quiros et al
as 3:2024cv00428
Plaintiff:
Barry J Arpin
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Scot Semple, Rollin Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bush v. The People of the State of New York et al
as 1:2024cv02359
Plaintiff:
Jahreek Bush
Defendant:
The People of the State of New York, County of Sullivan, New York State Police Liberty Barracks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
