Cases 11 - 20 of 204
Vasquez v. USA
as 1:2022cv06141
Petitioner:
Peter Vasquez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Boyd v. Guthrie et al
as 7:2022cv08549
Plaintiff:
Nyjee Boyd
Defendant:
Coreection Officer Charles Guthrie, Correction Officer Asantewa K. Tulloch, Correction Sergeant Jose Candelario and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vasquez v. Superintendent of Shawangunk Correctional Facility Facility
as 1:2022cv04954
Petitioner:
Abraham A. Vasquez
Respondent:
Superintendent of Shawangunk Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mohammed v. United States of America et al
as 1:2022cv01829
Plaintiff:
Aleah Mohammed
Defendant:
United States of America, Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. Franco et al
as 3:2022cv00129
Plaintiff:
Ralph Green
Defendant:
Franco, Guadarrama, Vasquez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stone #1 et al v. Kubik et al
as 1:2021cv01191
Plaintiff:
Jane Stone #1, Jane Stone #2, Jane Stone #4 and others
Defendant:
Brian Kubik, Susan Squires, David Stupnick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nimham-El-Dey v. Vasquez et al
as 1:2021cv08240
Plaintiff:
Abdullah Spencer Nimham-El-Dey
Defendant:
P.O. Vasquez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Germosen-Vasquez v. Cohen, Frankel and Ruggiero, LLP et al
as 1:2021cv07487
Plaintiff:
Ariel Germosen-Vasquez
Defendant:
Cohen, Frankel and Ruggiero, LLP and Mark Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc
Edwards v. Jones et al
as 1:2021cv05477
Plaintiff:
William L. Edwards
Defendant:
Capt. Figueroa, Capt. Robinson, Dep. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vasquez v. USA
as 3:2021cv00588
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Wilson Vasquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
