Cases 11 - 20 of 50,165
Does et al v. New York City et al
as 1:2024cv03042
Plaintiff:
John Does and Jane Does
Defendant:
New York City, Mayor Eric Adams, NYPD Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jean-Louis v. Fire Department New York et al
as 1:2024cv04650
Plaintiff:
Joe W. Jean-Louis
Defendant:
Fire Department New York and Govenor State of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duncan v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
as 1:2024cv04728
Plaintiff:
Derreck Keshaun Duncan
Defendant:
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Does et al v. New York City et al
as 1:2024cv04319
Plaintiff:
"John" Does and Jane Does
Defendant:
New York City, Eric Adams, NYPD Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Szatanek v. Clinton Superintendent
as 9:2024cv00779
Petitioner:
Steven D. Szatanek
Respondent:
Clinton Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Griffin v. Titus
as 9:2024cv00783
Petitioner:
Rudolph W. Griffin
Respondent:
A. Titus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Johnson v. City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv03173
Plaintiff:
Glenn Johnson
Defendant:
City of New York, New York City Correction Department, C.O. Ceesay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gu v. Chen et al
as 1:2024cv04612
Plaintiff:
Feifei Gu
Defendant:
Hang Chen, Emily Hui Chen-Liang, Susana Chong Chen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Randolph v. New York State
as 1:2024cv04623
Plaintiff:
Ryan K. Randolph
Defendant:
New York State
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pelaez v. Lowerre
as 2:2024cv03216
Petitioner:
Julio Pelaez
Respondent:
Superintendent E. Lowerre
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
