Cases 21 - 30 of 56
Miles v. USA
as 1:2018cv04191
Petitioner:
Deshawn Miles
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Demuth v. Chenango County Sheriff's Office et al
as 9:2018cv00816
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Demuth
Defendant:
Ernest Cutting, Corporal Collins, LT. Chris Miles, Sr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Demuth v. Chenango County Sheriff's Office et al
as 9:2018cv00813
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Demuth
Defendant:
Ernest Cutting, Town of Norwich, LT. Chris Miles, Sr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Demuth v. Chenango County Sheriff's Office et al
as 9:2018cv00795
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Demuth
Defendant:
LT. Chris Miles, Sr., Ernest Cutting, Town of Norwich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Franklin v. Chenango County Sheriff's Office et al
as 9:2018cv00794
Defendant:
Chenango County Sheriff's Office, Ernest Cutting, Town of Norwich and others
Plaintiff:
Ernest F. Franklin, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Demuth v. Chenango County Sheriff's Office et al
as 9:2018cv00789
Defendant:
SGT. Sickmond, Ernest Cutting, Town of Norwich and others
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Demuth and Michael Allen Demuth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miles v. USA
as 1:2016cv03351
Petitioner:
Deshawn Miles
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Monroe v. Gerbing et al
as 1:2016cv02818
Plaintiff:
Dwinel Monroe
Defendant:
Kathleen Gerbing, Anthony J. Annucci, Carl J. Koenigsmann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miles v. USA
as 1:2015cv08255
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Robert Lee Miles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Miles v. City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv09591
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Miles
Defendant:
City of New York, John Doe, John and Jane Does #10 through 14 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
