Cases 21 - 30 of 99
Jimenez v. Corey
as 1:2022cv01586
Petitioner:
Jose Jimenez
Respondent:
Joseph Corey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Beswick et al v. Barr et al
as 1:2020cv02765
Respondent:
Chad Wolf, Immigrations & Customs Enforcement, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Petitioner:
Dirkis Castrillo-Castrillo, Olvin Geovany Rodriguez, Yoscal Mogena-Jimenez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
Jimenez-Rodriguez v. USA
as 1:2020cv00222
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Edgar Joel Jimenez-Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jimenez v. Miller
as 1:2019cv05538
Petitioner:
Jose Jimenez
Respondent:
Christopher Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Collins v. New York City et al
as 1:2019cv07156
Defendant:
Melissa Jimenez-De Armas, Scott Stringer, Police Officer Lorraine Ramos and others
Plaintiff:
D'Juan Collins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jimenez v. The City of New York
as 1:2018cv07273
Defendant:
The City of New York
Plaintiff:
Jose Jimenez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jimenez v. Decker et al
as 1:2018cv05285
Respondent:
Thomas Decker , Kirstjen M. Nielsen , Jefferson B. Sessions, III and others
Petitioner:
Ludivia Jimenez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Williams v. Pataki
as 18-1129
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kevin Williams, AKA Kirby Stewart
Defendant - Appellee:
Governor Thomas J. Ridge, in his official capacity, for Injunctive Relief, Nancy Jimenez, in her official capacity, for Monetary Relief, Joseph C. Madenspacher, in his official capacity, for Injunctive Relief and others
Jimenez v. Artus
as 1:2018cv00533
Plaintiff:
Ivan J. Jimenez
Defendant:
Superintendent Dale Artus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Pataki et al
as 1:2017cv05138
Defendant:
Nancy Jimenez, Joseph C. Madenspacher, Gov George Pataki and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
