Cases 21 - 30 of 827
Andrews v. Schumacher et al
as 1:2023cv03634
Plaintiff:
Dashawn Andrews
Defendant:
William Schumacher, Michael Vitale and Matthew McCurry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bruni v. Sheehan et al
as 9:2023cv00534
Plaintiff:
Thomas Carl Bruni
Defendant:
Kathy M. Sheehan, Dixon, Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Santos et al v. Parmitel et al
as 9:2023cv00401
Plaintiff:
Francisco Santos, Windsor Coleman, Miguel Melendez and others
Defendant:
Cheryl Parmitel, Chaz Andrews, W. N. Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruggiero v. Rogers et al
as 1:2023cv00229
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ruggiero
Defendant:
Donald D. Rogers, Mark E. Carrow, Joseph H. Noeth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Donald J. Trump Inc. U.S.A. et al
as 1:2023cv02025
Plaintiff:
Oday Kevin Thompson and Odray Kevin Thompson
Defendant:
Donald J. Trump Inc. U.S.A., Prince Andrew, Princess Kate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moss v. City of New York et al
as 1:2023cv01632
Plaintiff:
Andrew Moss
Defendant:
The City of New York, Correction Officer Melvine Lewis, CO Ebaka and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Andrews v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv01412
Plaintiff:
Shateek Andrews
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Bryant v. Home Depot et al
as 6:2023cv06111
Plaintiff:
Keith Bryant
Defendant:
Home Depot and Andrew Seiler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barrett v. Ballard et al
as 9:2023cv00113
Plaintiff:
Andrew Barrett
Defendant:
D. Ballard, T. Trombley and S. Snomea
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. McGuinness
as 9:2023cv00077
Petitioner:
Andrew Jones
Respondent:
T. McGuinness
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
