Cases 21 - 30 of 680
Cohen v. United States of America et al
as 1:2023cv08099
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Cohen
Defendant:
United States of America, Eddie Anderson, Emery McCoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nkarakwi v. Searls
as 6:2023cv06456
Petitioner:
Rodriech Nkarakwi
Respondent:
Jeffrey Searls
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Navarro v. Carroll et al
as 1:2023cv06657
Plaintiff:
Angel Navarro
Defendant:
Detective Jeffrey Carroll, Police Officer Frank Feliciano, Narcotics Det. 25th John Hourican and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henries v. Searls
as 1:2023cv00750
Petitioner:
Edward Henries
Respondent:
Jeffrey Searls
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Navarro v. Carroll et al
as 1:2023cv05491
Plaintiff:
Angel Navarro
Defendant:
Jeffrey Carroll, Frank Feliciano, John Hourican and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kiptanui v. Searls
as 1:2023cv00672
Petitioner:
James Tanui Kiptanui
Respondent:
Jeffrey Searls
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
First v. Dinello et al
as 6:2023cv06391
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey First
Defendant:
David Dinello, Jill Northrop, Venkata Mannava and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Randall v. Barnett et al
as 9:2023cv00743
Plaintiff:
Jarrod Carl Randall and Jarrod C. Randall
Defendant:
Peter R. Barnett, James Gayne, Robert Newtown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moco v. Searls
as 6:2023cv06316
Petitioner:
Robert Moco
Respondent:
Jeffrey Searls
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Holmes v. Groder et al
as 2:2023cv04140
Plaintiff:
Ms. Alexander Holmes
Defendant:
Jeffrey Groder, Michael Kamperveen and Andrea Shiry Ann Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
